Usenko, S. O.Getya, A. A.Matvieiev, M.Hryshchenko, N.Asbier, E.Staaf Larsson, B.Karlsson, A.Wie, H.Zamaratskaia, G.Kravchenko, O. I.Kocina, I.Ansone, L.Ribikauskas, V.Khalilova, I.Mammadov, A.Ojaghi, I.Arney, D.Leming, R.Carnovale. F.Усенко, Світлана ОлексіївнаГетя, Андрій Анатолійович2024-01-102024-01-102023-04-27https://dspace.pdau.edu.ua/handle/123456789/16149S. Usenko,. A.Getya, M. Matvieiev, N. Hryshchenko, E. Asbier, B. Staaf Larsson, A. Karlsson, H. Wie, G. Zamaratskaia, O. Kravchenko, I. Kocina, L. Ansone, V. Ribikauskas, I. Khalilova, A. Mammadov, J. Ojaghi, D. Arney, R. Leming, F. Carnovale. The attitudesof consumers and farmers in Ukraine toward animal welfare. Book of Abstracts of the 1 st Regional Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science. № 29 (2023), Nitra, Slovakia. 26-28 April, 2023. P. 79.A faiitate the adaption ofthe FL requirements, eure issues in animal welfare in Ukraine sho d Totally 47 QW o6veannute paiinss ers had stricter opinion than farmers cegarding anal wee legisation. Particularly, 93% of consumers and only 82 > farmers beloved tha the Beisation should be impr and $9% of farmers regarded enim Usraine as god 28 @ Venpaeutsc tant welfare isses defined by the farmers were inappropriateposing ughier co increased production co: ack of the state support.enAnimal welfareconsumerfarmerBook